Now here's a big surprise. Rob Enderle has slammed the study recently released by OSDL and Levanta showing that Linux is easier and cheaper to maintain than Windows. I think we all understand that any of these studies is going to somewhat reflect the biases of the sponsors. But I find it ironic that Enderle criticizes OSDL's credibility while he's supportive of flawed Microsoft-funded studies. I wonder who pays his bills?
Comments